Lucky(ish), Second Time Around

This week I was intensely and disconcertingly drawn to someone I’ve never, ever met before. But, because he looked like someone I used to know – a man once who said something to me that might have changed the course of my life -  I felt like I knew him. And so I immediately liked him a lot.

He reminded me of the friend of a man I dated ten years ago. I loved that guy a lot (the guy I dated, not his friend. Obviously, the other way around would have been inappropriate).

And that guy – the one I dated – drove me batty in both good and bad ways. Let’s call this guy “Prince”.

(I may once have named his hypothetical baby “Prince Magic My Dad is Hot but Not Very Nice To Women Zuma, Jr”.)

Prince was gorgeous, stylish, passionate, brave, and showed me his vulnerable side…and I adored that about him.

Prince was also new to the country and wanted to plant his fashionable
boot firmly on the back of my neck. He told me I asked too many
questions, talked too much, and he wanted me to mind him.

And that…well that I did NOT adore.

So we fought a lot (which, by the way, is HIGHLY unusual for me.
I’m definitely more of a lover than a fighter) and broke up a
lot. I cried a lot.

And one time, when we got back together, his friend Lucky came
over to talk to us.

Lucky said,

I know you two love each other a lot, but all this fighting and
crying and breaking up and getting back together is ridiculous. I’m glad that you’ve made up, and I hope it works out this time…I’m hoping that this time around you’ll be adults who will be rational and communicate with each other instead of fighting.  If you’re fighting all the time, then something’s really wrong. That’s not love, that’s drama.

I was MORTIFIED. Here I was, a grown-ass woman of 27, and someone needed to talk to me as though I was a fourteen year old just figuring out
dating.

But…

The next time Prince and I had a fight – and our fights almost always
concluded in a (usually temporary) break-up – Lucky’s words echoed
in my head.

“Ridiculous. Communication. Adults. Drama.”

And I told Prince, “if you do what you usually do – refuse to speak to
me for a day or a week or three weeks – then when you are ready to talk to me, it will be too late. I’m not doing what we’ve been doing any more.”

And I meant it. And, sure enough, when he called three weeks later to apologize and tell me he loved me, I said, “I meant it. No more.”

And I SUFFERED. I wanted that guy so much.

But I didn’t want to be in a relationship that required interventions from friends. I didn’t want drama. I wanted love.

So I’m lucky that Lucky intervened. I’m lucky that he had the balls and the wisdom (and was exasperated enough!) to speak the truth.

And I carried that wisdom forward into my life.

Mostly.

And that’s who this guy resembles. Lucky.

Lucky me.

Red Shoe Blogger Writing Workshop in Vancouver

Psssst…It is Not All Copywriting, All The Time
or
How NOT to Be a Boring Blogger
or
Just So You Know, This is A Sales Letter for My Writing Workshop

This might be a little frou-frou academic but let’s get polemic and creative and re-interpret The Blog. Add jazz hands as necessary.

Yes. I’m for real. I’d kinda like to encourage you to mangle language, stream consciously (or un), make wild analogies, mix and unmatch metaphors, make up words (plurk), get taxidermical with George Orwell, run fast and loose with slutty punctuation, wax lyrical, write 12,000 word essays (on porn – please – at least keep us interested), create loopy titles that are paragraphs and induce migraines and embrace that as a personal objective, take on personal titles as pronouncements and dub yourself Queen of the Gays/non-sequiturs, and toggle between play-dough and Plato.

Read poetry and if you must, write it, but for the love of ye gods and all that is holy DO NOT INFLICT ANY OF IT ON US.

Instead, channel Hemingway and write anorexic prose. Or embellish. Amplicate. Invest in curlicues and adverbs, make adjectives your bitch, and swear a mofo lot in cynical cartoons because that’s just funny.

Be funny. Insist on detailing the amoebic nuances of daily, boring, beautiful life. Tell us about the time your little brother glued his G.I. Joe’s to the kitchen wall and declared war against all things legume. But stay away from clown sex.

(Probably NSFW. Google The Bloggess and clowns – and squids, while you’re at it.)

Mess around with fonts and characters and spacing to make your point. Sidle up to your point and kiss it on the shoulder. Parse. Write some unscannable pieces (whaaaaa? No lists? No bullets? No headers? Fetch the stake and the matches!). Please. Thank you.

Use vivid, physical, metaphorical language (mad, insane, crazy-making, blinded, deafened, crippled, disabled, epileptic, schizophrenic, idiot, fat, MILF- what?! because usually, not so much?? – bitch, pimp). Despair at the politically nefarious connotations of that language. Talk about it. Write through it. Invent a new language.

Link to everything. Link to Jonathan Swift (thanks, Seth). Link to nothing, at all, ever. Let your copy stand on its own.

Promise never, ever to use the word copy again. Liar.

Indulge in the dash. Be parenthetical. Be self-referential. Pretend you’re an expert. Admit you don’t know a thing except how to be wildly intellectually mastubatory while using your blog as therapy. It is all a writing prompt, after all, and we’re all in it together.

Create characters (The FarmerThe Gentleman Caller. You), address your readers directly,  imagine you’re Samuel Richardsonand your blog is your  Clarissa and in fact blogs are the new epistolary novel because that’s not pretentious at all. It’s still true.

Go dirty. Go highbrow. Result in raised eyebrows.

Decide that you can’t decide between your two beloved babies, fragment or run-on sentences, and just out and out dare people to call the grammar police.

(Because what is grammar for? Writing clearly and conveying your point effectively. Use it. Abuse it. Bend it like Beckham. Do whatever you need to do.)

Be homey. Invite us in. Strip textually naked. Surprise!

——————–

Do you want to  surprise – and delight – your readers (and hell,yourself) with wild and free writing?

I can teach you some specific techniques to create emotional tension in your work. I can help you unlock – unleash! – your unique writing voice.

And I do that in a writing workshop that is chock-full of inventive exercises, examples, and gossip.

(Because writers are storytellers which is just a fancy way of saying we can’t keep a secret.)

…and we’ll do that, together, in a two hour workshop in Vancouver.

How Not to Be a Boring Writer: The Workshop

Here’s how it goes down:

  • you, me and twenty-odd (they don’t have to be odd but it helps) people
  • two hours of chewy-delicious talk and practical tips
  • how to introduce emotional contrast (it is essential, darling)
  • how to use telling, telegraphic details
  • threading the grommets – pulling metaphorical threads through your piece and tying it up in a pretty (or messy – you decide) knot at the end
  • examples, exercises and lotsa love.

Bonus:

+ a rant on why it is crucially, politically, artistically important to write personal

+ profanity. No extra charge.

The Details:

Saturday, July 17

1pm to 3pm(ish)

Hollyhock Room, 4th Floor

163 West Hastings

Vancouver BC

$100 CDN Add to Cart

————–

PS never, ever do what I just did. Promiscuous out-linking in sales pages is VERBOTEN. Sales letters should NOT have links to anything except your “buy now, dammit!” page.

So. Do as I say not as I do.

Except in the writing workshop – you’re coming, right? – where you WILL TOTALLY OBEY my every command.

xoxoxo

————

wanna be an affiliate? E-mail me!

boundaries vs disposable friendships: a checklist

…and this morning maybe I have the (possibly self-righteous) answer to the question that is haunting me:

How can I tell when I’m casually disposing of a friendship or ending it to protect or establish a necessary boundary?

(Or, in other words, not being a martyr or a doormat or hanging in there with someone who doesn’t truly care about me in words and deed.)

and the answer is…

A checklist. Clearly I’ve been body-snatched.

  1. Was I brave?
  2. Was I open-hearted?
  3. Did I ask for what I need?
  4. Could I do more to fix this?
  5. Did I offer and try my very best?
  6. Is the other person trying his/her very best, too?
  7. If I walk away, do I know, to my bones, that I did all I could do?

and, finally:

endings aren’t forever. They might just be for now. Sometimes we grow up and come back together. Sometime we grow apart. Sometimes we grow.

the difference between ‘healthy boundaries’ and disposable friendships

Often when we’re talking about growing our souls, living big, shining - in other words, when we’re stroking our things while mouthing the words ‘personal development’ - we speak about clearing our life of toxic friendships, bad influences, and people who trigger our fears or the worst in us.

On the one hand, I understand. I’ve done it. I’ve ended friendships and romances because I was turning into someone I didn’t want to be. Because I was hurting. Because they were hurting. Because we weren’t doing anything good for each other. Because we were, in fact, making each other worse.

On the other hand, I worry about this trend towards disposable friendships, relationships, and marriages.

I have such mixed feelings about marriage. I liked being married. I hope my kids get married some day. I want to get married some day. EVERYONE should have the right to get married if they want to.

And I am totally fucking terrified both by the prospect of getting married again and at the thought that I might not marry again.

And, so given my fraught relationship with marriage, I don’t do weddings. I make excuses. I schedule vacations that conflict with the date. My gift arrives but I do not.

I don’t go, because marriage is sacred and I threw my own marriage away. I can’t shake off that shame.

I’m not alone.

A friend of mine is separated and working his way through his grief to a divorce, and he doesn’t think he’ll marry again. Not because he is afraid to, but because even if he divorces, he’s still married. He made a commitment. He’ll be married forever because marriage is forever.

Obviously, this is going to be a problem for him and anyone who one day entertains thoughts of marrying him.

But…I understand what he’s thinking. I respect it. I wish I understood this exact point when I was on the precipice of leaving. I wish I understood this before I got to the point where the only escape was to leap off the married cliff into…

not the abyss. Being single isn’t a curse – but divorce is a nightmare. It is a tearing asunder of that which has been joined together.

And although I would tear apart with my own prettily-polished nails all of those ‘thinkers’ *ahem* who blame rising divorce rates (are they still rising? or do we just like to run around screaming “the sky is falling! the sky is falling! oh my god those feminists are raining divorces down on the innocents! the sky is falling!) on that pesky women’s liberation, I do wonder if as a culture we’re now taking marriage less seriously.

I wish, when I married, that I had grasped the magnitude of the commitment I was making. I wish, when I was divorcing, that I hadn’t collapsed my world into a binary choice of leaving/saving self and staying/sacrificing self. I wish I had realized that in every marriage there is a conversation between space and intimacy. That you can have space and intimacy in a marriage. That you don’t have to marry the perfect person. That there is no perfect person. That leaving can indeed save your soul but so can staying. That even though leaving seems easier, it is probably much, much harder.

Which, of course, is not to say I would go back. You can never go back.

What I am trying to say is that I have treated people, relationships and marriages as consumable goods. I go shopping for the thing I think I want or need, and then when I get it home and find it didn’t fill the gap, hit the spot, or look as good at the kitchen table as I had expected, I return it or get rid of it.

That’s treating people and relationships as disposable goods. That’s using people to meet my needs rather than appreciating them as they are, for who they are.

And that’s obviously not okay.

So I get a little icked out when I read that you can change your life by changing your friendships, or that your weight or your income can be predicted/determined by the five people you spend the most time with blah blah blah.

(My six year old and four year old own my time and their cumulative weights and incomes are skewing the averages down, down, down. Ought I get rid of them? Or just embrace my future impoverished but slim self?)

And, at the same time, sometimes the people in your life are terrible for you, and you do need to develop new boundaries. And maybe new friends. Or a different lover. Or no lover at all.

But where is the line that tells us when we’re establishing boundaries or disposals?

Because I’m having trouble telling the difference. When am I wisely dumping a friend or a lover because they’re bad for me and when am I casually disposing of a relationship because it doesn’t match the wallpaper?

Is the line between disposable relationships and healthy boundaries a fixed or moving frontier?

I wonder this, when I’m hurting, and when I want and need and deserve something that someone in my life won’t give me. Do I walk away from this person because she’s not serving up what I want for breakfast? Or do I find ways to satisfy my own needs so I am able to love him unconditionally?

Are the people in my life here to meet my needs, which means they can be disposed of when they don’t?

I am repulsed by a consumer approach to relationships.

But am I so porous and my boundaries so permeable that I’ll stay committed to someone or something that can’t or won’t help me get what I want and need?

Wondering about these questions wears me out. I am tired.

I don’t have the answers even though they are the subject of many a 4am freak-out. And so I am tired.

I stay up late or wake up early thinking about these questions and so I am tired.

I pack around these questions on my back and that backpack is already heavy with the responsibilities. I’m almost always entirely responsible for the care and feeding of Love and my loved ones. And so I am tired.

My questioning heart, head and shoulders are tired.

Which makes this exactly and urgently the right time to determine what things to let go of and what things to carry.

And, I suspect, this is when we damsels, fair maidens and princesses have been trained to look for a dude on a white horse to carry us, too.

I Love You Like A Lantern In The Dark

We’re at my parent’s house. We’re staying in the cabin.

10.14 pm. I walked to The House to get extra blankets and pillows.

It is dark. My mother lit candles in little tin cans all along the path from the cabin to the house. Beautiful. Romantic.

At the house, I turn around…

and my little one, my almost-four year old, is there.

Mama, I’m scared.

So scared that she braved a trek across a quarter of an acre from the cabin to the house in the dark?

And so I wonder, in my best Carrie Bradshaw fashion, how often we think or say “I’m scared” when what we mean is:

I miss you

I want you

I need you

Don’t go

Stay

Shine

Choice. Commitment. Freedom. Cats. ARRRR Matey.

“Learn to go through one door and many others will open for you; try to go through five doors at once and you’ll go nowhere.” – C. Andrew Ramsey, M.D., a psychiatry professor at Columbia University

Ahem. It has recently been drawn to my attention that my moaning, bemoaning and *bitching* (let’s be honest) about men and commitment is a form of projection.

The men in my life aren’t commitment-phobic.

I am.

Ooops.

Sorry, guys.

———–

Here’s how it goes down:

I start dating a guy. I get a little starry-eyed over him which means I get a lot scared. So I shit-test him (thanks, Seduction Community for the lingo): Does he have my back? Will he run when things get scary? How can I freak him out to find out how reliable he is?

I know! I’ll talk about marriage and babies!!!

And it works *almost* every time.

ALMOST inevitably the dude thinks I’m too much, too soon and retreats/disappears for period of time spanning somewhere between three weeks and three months (two outliers: eight years and nine years each).

But wait! There’s more!

Almost as inevitably as the hasty retreat is the advance. After three weeks/months, he comes back and says, Ok. I’m all in. It’s all on the table. Love, marriage, babies. House in the suburbs. White picket fence. I’ll paint it for you, baby.

But by that time, I’ve got a new dude, so I smile regretfully (and smugly – because I KNEW I WAS THE BEST THING THAT EVER HAPPENED TO YOU!!!) and make noises about ‘timing’.

And then I turn and look at my new dude with narrow and skeptical eyes and think, WTF? The other guy wants to marry me and you can’t decide if you’re in or out?! Get in or get out! I WANT BABIES, NEW DUDE!

And he runs away for three weeks to three months, realizes the error of his ways, comes back…

and wash, rinse, repeat.

So I use commitment as my shit-test to avoid commitment.

Because I am the one who is scared.

————-

Some maybe-scary stuff:

Maybe I don’t want the white picket fence. (But I do want the baby). Maybe I don’t want the conventional suburban marriage. (But I do want the lasting love). Maybe I don’t want the house. Maybe I want to live a little more nomadically. Maybe I don’t know how to get the life and partner I want because it is so far from the map I’ve been trained to read and follow. Maybe I don’t want a relation-ship. Maybe I want a pirate ship.

———-
It isn’t that I’m afraid to choose a partner. I am oh-so-capable of being fiercely loyal and loving.

It isn’t that I’m afraid of committing to someone I love.

It isn’t that I’m afraid of losing my freedom. I don’t think that choosing one path is a loss of freedom. I think walking it IS freedom.

It is that I’m afraid that by choosing and committing to a partner that I will have to live the life I’ve already rejected.

It is that I’m afraid that the kind of love, family and life that I want is so far removed from suburban reality that it might not be possible. And so I’ll die alone with cats.

And cats do bad things to furniture and I like my upholstery on the unshredded side.

———

The problem with choice, commitment and freedom is that we’ve framed them up so that an abundance of choice is freedom, commitment involves choosing to winnow down the choices available to you, and therefore commitment to a particular path or person or choice equals a loss of freedom.

And that’s crap.

An abundance of choice is the mirage of freedom.

We think we can do anything and so, dazzled by an array of crazysexycool opportunities, do nothing at all.

Freedom is not a buffet of opportunity.

Freedom is the ability to choose and live your choice.

Think about the opposite of freedom.

Slavery.

In slavery, you are not able to choose or live your choice. You’re not able to decide your destiny, create it, live it.

It isn’t necessarily the absence of choice that defines a lack of freedom – though that’s certainly a huge part of it – it is the absolute foreclosure of the ability to LIVE your choice.

In our society, going to university is an option. We think everyone’s got it.

So yay! I can go to university! The option is there! I can see the campus!

But…

  • if I can’t afford to go
  • if no one in my family or community shows me what that looks like
  • if the culture of the university is alien to me
  • if a million things in my day-to-day reality mean that I cannot realize a university education

then that option is meaningless. There’s no freedom there.

Freedom is the capacity to turn your option into a choice and live it.

Freedom is making the choice real. It is choosing. It is narrowing the options down and living with and through the one you choose. Freedom is a privilege and that privilege is commitment.

Come what may. Hell or high water or himalayan kittens. Spectre of death-by-cats-and-pirates and all.

—————-

PS – Speaking of pirates and pirate ships, this is my house key. Symbolic, much?


Money, Commitment, Sacrifice, Starbucks

I’ve been sorting out what money means to me and the answer is this:

mostly, not much.

This might explain why I’m not rolling in filthy lucre.

I’ve written about it before: money isn’t really my currency.

When I think about the money part of my business, I get bored.

When I think about the things I ought to do with my money – buy a house, buy a better car, save for vacations and retirement (ha! as if I’ll retire from writing!) – I get even more bored.

Because I’m disenchanted with those conventional ends, the means (money) don’t mean much.

But when I started thinking about what having more money means  I can do for other people, or how I could use money to serve Life As A Grand Adventure rather than a mortgage (french: mort = death), I realize,

Money is commitment.

(thunderclap! lightning bolt! gregorian chants!)

There’s a reason we say “put your money where your mouth is.” Where we put our resources – time, love, cash – on a daily basis creates, demonstrates and confirms our commitments.

I put most of my money into providing a stable, suburban infrastructure for my children. Because I’m unwaveringly committed to them.

(And legally and morally obliged. But mostly because I love them and so I don’t mind giving them all my money. It’s a privilege.)

(And by this measure, my next most committed relationship is with Starbucks.)

But committed, and commitment, is not the same thing as sacrifice – although lots of relationship experts, money gurus and spiritual leaders tell us otherwise.

We’re often encouraged to “sacrifice” for the long game, the portfolio of riches, or to get to heaven.

Sacrifice spending now so that you can save for later. Sacrifice dating and independence for marriage. Sacrifice TV time for blogging. Sacrifice a tidy house for a generative creative life. Sacrifice freedom for a day job. Sacrifice a day job to be an entrepreneur. Sacrifice your time to run errands for a lover who’s swamped.

And all of these things are valuable and necessary to accomplish your goals and support your loved ones.

But they aren’t sacrifice.

Sacrifice is when you trade something dearly attractive for something unattractive.

Get under your desk. The world is upside down. I’m about to quote Ayn Rand.

“Sacrifice” does not mean the rejection of the worthless, but of the precious. “Sacrifice” does not mean the rejection of the evil for the sake of the good, but of the good for the sake of the evil. “Sacrifice” is the surrender of that which you value in favor of that which you don’t.

If you exchange a penny for a dollar, it is not a sacrifice; if you exchange a dollar for a penny, it is. If you achieve the career you wanted, after years of struggle, it is not a sacrifice; if you then renounce it for the sake of a rival, it is. If you own a bottle of milk and give it to your starving child, it is not a sacrifice; if you give it to your neighbor’s child and let your own die, it is.

If you give money to help a friend, it is not a sacrifice; if you give it to a worthless stranger, it is. If you give your friend a sum you can afford, it is not a sacrifice; if you give him money at the cost of your own discomfort…if you give him money at the cost of disaster to yourself—that is…sacrifice in full.

…A sacrifice is the surrender of a value.

So, then, according to Rand (seriously, I cannot believe I’m doing this!), sacrifice is the surrender of value, and specifically of a higher value to a lower one.

  • When we forgo going out at night to work on a project for school or work, we’re not sacrificing.
  • When, instead of buying hot and unnecessary new shoes for ourselves we buy our children new coats and rainboots, we’re not sacrificing.
  • When we do not put that trip on the credit card and instead take a debt-free tour of a national park, we’re not sacrificing.
  • When we decide to ignore the crumbs on the floor so we can knock out an extraordinary essay/painting/consultation, we’re not sacrificing.

We’re delaying gratification.

We’re trading the things that are low in value for things that are high in value.

We’re INVESTING – in ourselves, our loved ones, our dreams, our reality.

And that’s commitment.

Commitment is not sacrifice.

Commitment is trading the things that don’t mean much for the things that do.

Commitment is putting your money where your heart is.

———–

Challenge:

think about money ‘n commitment, and tell us in the comments:

what does the way you spend your money say about your commitments?

does the way you earn your money line up with your commitments?


our touch-phobic, sex-obsessed culture. We’re sublimating, kids.

Sure, I’m obsessed with sex. I’m also obsessed with food, status, security and avoiding pain and I’m willing to bet it is historic hard-wiring. It is my reptile brain. My mammal brain. My humanity. My femininity.

And, I suspect, my culture too.

Because other than my lovers, and my children are the only people who kiss and hug and touch me.

If I didn’t have two small, non-profit distributors of kisses and cuddles, my life would be bereft of skin-to-skin, lip-to-lip, chest-to-chest, and heart-to-heart contact.

And so in the sex dance the moments that most deeply thrill me have nothing to do with getting off. They’re about getting close. About skin and human heat and intimacy and together.

Like: the sweet shock of a suddenly bare chest-to-chest embrace.

Like: voluptuous, extravagant kissing that tells stories.

Like: permission to touch someone.

So I understand all the hullaballoo “adults” in the media are raising about pre-mature sexualization and teen hook-up culture (as if it is strictly a teen phenomena):

oh my god it will be The Death of Intimacy.

It is soul-less, mercenary, predatory, and if they keep it up, Those Kids Today won’t develop the interpersonal skills necessary to support lasting, loving, intimate relationships.

And the dyad is the cornerstone of North American culture, y’all! How will we fight about what marriage means and who gets to be allowed to do it if Those Damn Kids are too busy hooking up to settle down?

Those Kids Today are going to break society.

As if it isn’t already broken.

We worry, too, about the broken souls of promiscuous girls – when we’re not ogling them and eating them up – who use sex to feel loved. Who are lacking the love, affection, commitment and validation they (and all human folk) need, and so seek it in sex. Who shortcircuit love and emotional intimacy for carnal electricity.

Well, hell, don’t only point the finger at sad and lonely fifteen year old girls.

They’re not the only ones sexting. Trust. They’re not the only lonely ones aching for touch. Believe.

When I was eighteen, a young man knocked on my dorm room door and invited me for a motorcycle ride. It was night. It was cold. We went back to his house and he offered me hot chocolate. He stood at the counter, mixing the cocoa, with his back to me, and I felt an overwhelming desire to hug him. So I did.  I walked up behind him and slipped and tightened my arms around him. I leaned into him. I held him.

He stiffened.

Then he grabbed and held my arms and hands that were holding him and melted into me. I can’t even put into words what happened in that hug. There was a fierceness and a hunger in that surrender. That connection is forever carved into me.

He told me that he couldn’t remember the last time someone hugged him. And when he worked at remembering he realized that his last hug happened when he was seven years old.

Four years later, I married that guy. That was probably a mistake.

But emotion-free, intimacy-lite hook ups are probably less of a psyche-eating danger to Those Kids Today than is untrammelled, soul-scarring, love ‘n unprepared early marriage.

And we’re all hungry. For touch, intimacy, sex, cuddling, communion.

Offerings. Coins in the Bowl. Doing Rich.

F told me a story.

I upstairs doing laundry or folding laundry or having a shower or something.

Sophie and Lola were talking Money.

Sophie announced that she was rich.

Apparently, Lola is rich too and she owned it, loudly.

So Sophie showed Lola (and F) her bowl o’ money.

Lola said that she was still richer than Sophie.

Sophie was offended. Deeply. If she had a book of grievous injuries, this slight would have been recorded.

Lola, when you say you’re richer than me, you hurt my feelings!

Lola ran upstairs…and returned with two quarters.

She put one quarter in Sophie’s bowl o’ money.

She stood in front of Sophie with downturned eyes and “I’m sorry” written right through her body.

Sophie wrapped her arms around Lola and said, “I know you’re sorry for hurting my feelings. I know you didn’t mean it.”

And Lola said, “Thank you for forgiving me, Sophie.”

—————
Money is love, or maybe we conflate the two.

We offer our coins to the bowl of forgiveness.

Women – even “independent” women – sometimes surrender their finances to their men, because that feels like “being taken care of.”

Men adorn their exoskeletons with lures of green and silver to hook lovers and partners. (So do women. Don’t ask me how I know.)

We buy things we don’t need with money we don’t have to impress people we don’t know.

We spend to feel rich.

And rich is a beautiful thing, but feeling rich is a high.

Being rich, on the other hand,  cannot be bought. It is an investment. It must be lived and shared.

When I share my gifts and invest in others and myself – with time, with money, with opportunity – I’m doing rich. I am rich.

Opportunities can be purchased. Access to information, experience, and even inspiration can be purchased (just ask any ass-kicking coach or consultant or firestarter, or better yet, listen to their delighted, living-big clients who rave “life-changing!”).

But true learning and knowledge and action all comes from you. From doing it. Living it.

You’re rich when you give yourself the things you need to succeed…and then go make love to the world with them.

—————
Two announcements:

1. From now on, on Tuesdays, I write about money.
2. As of Friday, June 18, Dave Doolin and I are raising the prices for our League of Extraordinary Bloggers Sessions to $300.

(So yes, if you book and pay before then, we’ll honour the $150 offer.)

We know that $300 is still a screaming good value, because every single one of our clients so far has told us that we are wildly undercharging. ($500 is the figure that gets bandied about.)

And even at $300 we know we’re undercharging – and we’re pretty cool with that – because we’re irrationally committed to perfection. I won’t even tell you how much research we do on our clients and their sites because you would sigh and shake your head. (Unless you’re a client, in which case you’ll love us with an unholy passion.)

Basically, we care, passionately, about our people – and between the two of us, we Know Some Serious Shit about blogging.

(Even though we both have The Issues with the word blogging.)

We want you to have the best blog and business you can (umm, and so do you, right?), so we look at every single aspect of your work and your niche and tell you how to position yourself to get better and to win. Every day. Day in and day out.

and pssssst…we tell you our secrets. And we’re not even charging extra for profanity (any more).

honeypots, fairy tales and the myth of commitment phobic men

me, to Dave, two days ago:
Kelly:…I’m so much more nefarious and strategic than anyone gives me credit for
Kelly: ‘cept you.
Kelly: and my ex.
Kelly: He’s convinced our entire marriage was a conspiracy.

————-

And he’s probably not entirely wrong.

————-

Wondering: maybe, sometimes, this is what The Dudes think?

That this relationship business is a honeypot -

- a bait-and-switch almost too seductive to resist?

Because the truth is…sometimes it is a honeypot.

Sometimes we (and by “we” I mean “I”) want The Relationship more than we want the man in front of us.

But he’d look so nice painting that white picket fence.

And so he’ll do.

—————–

My ex is A Good Guy and I did him wrong.

In the aftermath of our split, here’s the score:

I have a beautiful house, two devilish/angelic kids (depending who you ask), a career, and pretty much everything I ever wanted.

(‘Cept a partner. But these things happen when they happen. And a vehicle with German engineering. But again, will happen eventually.)

He lives alone with the BMW,  rottweiler and leather sofa.

I can see why he thinks he got screwed.

I can see why he thinks that one of us had an agenda all along.

I can see why some of us are hesitant to jump in and swim again.

—————

At dinner a couple of months ago, my friend Lianne Raymond (teacher, life coach but she prefers the term “life poet”) told us that the young men she teaches are amazing. They’re sensitive, emotionally expressive, tender, affectionate and they have great communication skills.

And these sixteen and seventeen year old soon-to-be men come to her with broken hearts. They’re distraught when their relationships dissolve. They take it so much harder than do the young women.

Her theory? Heterosexual men aren’t allowed to express their emotions in other venues of their lives, so they often make their girlfriends their emotional centres. Their partners are their most trusted confidantes and sometimes their only source of emotional support. And so when they lose that relationship, they suffer intensely. They’ve lost the relationship, the friendship, and the emotional solidarity.

Women, on the other hand, are terrific at spreading their emotional needs across a network of friends and sisters. When a relationship breaks up, they’ve still got sources of emotional support.

And that’s why lots of women love Sex and The City. For the friendship. Because it is true.

———-

The connections?

I’m wrestling with the eternal issue of commitment phobia.

And here’s what I think: heterosexual men and women are equally emotional. We all have emotions, we just express them and the needs that drive them, differently.

Men need partners just as much as women do. Men aren’t inherently afraid to commit.

But I think the fairy tale that women decry as restrictive and delusional is just as narrow and confining for men.

I had lunch with a colleague and he told me that The Fairy Tale seduces and betrays men, too. He has two gay friends who married women and had families – and then had to leave them – because they desperately wanted to be let into the dream.

This dream needs to be re-dreamed so that love and family is at the centre rather than heterosexuality and rules that pinch us more than they protect us.

My point…I do have one,  you know.

In the fairy tale, where is the prince? Who is the prince? What does he do?

Not much, actually. He just shows up and satisfies female yearning.

Now I’m sure there are times when that is a great gig.

But do we care about the Prince’s character development? Do we care who he is? Do we even see him?

He’s Prince Charming. He’s tall, dark and handsome and his kisses break spells. He looks good on a white horse. He shows up to be married at the appropriate moment.

Basically, he’s marriageable.

Now, if I described a woman like that (marriageable) I think we’d all agree that I didn’t really say a damn thing about her. We’d have no idea who she is.

And so I’m wondering if “commitment phobic” men – and I don’t believe that men are truly commitment phobic – fear, deeply, that the women in their lives value them for their roles rather than their selves?

Do men fear being valued for their husband-ability rather than their intrinsic and individual worth?

And…if they do fear that, no wonder they hesitate to jump in and commit. Because if they do commit and it all goes to hell they’ll be sleeping on the leather sofa. Alone.

(Maybe with the dog but only if the dog commits the grievous error of peeing on bare female feet and so Must Go, too.)

And he’ll be gazing at the ceiling, suffering, wondering what the hell happened and what he’s going to do and who he can talk to while his ex convenes with her girlfriends, sisters and goddesses who eternally and unconditionally have her back, heart and soul.

If I was him I’d be scared too.

Wouldn’t you?