Sunday School for Sentences #1: Explain the Expected in Unexpected Ways
- By Kelly Diels
- 5 September, 2010
- 50 Comments
Luminous, live writing is microscopic.
Ninety percent of good writing is getting the tiny, exacting, laborious details right. Or wrong. Jarring, syncopated writing can be delicious, too.
When I work with other writers and bloggers, they tell me that writing is hard, they don’t have enough time, they don’t feel inspired, and they’re not sure that their writing matters.
When I hear this, I hear:
+ “I’m waiting for Inspiration to overcome me and the writing to pour forth.”
+ “I’m waiting for writing to be easy.”
+ “The conditions of my life are not ideal.”
+ “I don’t have time to write for hours and hours a day.”
+ “If I’m not actively writing for hours and hours a day on the Next Great Novel or A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius, then my writing doesn’t count.”
And all of this adds up to these two conclusions:
So why bother?
and
I can’t. I can’t. I can’t. I can’t.
Neither of these conclusions yield any writing much less good writing. When attempting to create dazzling copy it is useful to avoid formulas that add up to writers block.
And so, my darling, if you’re been thinking any of these awful things, then I have great news for you.
You’re wrong.
You don’t need inspiration; most writing will NEVAH be easy; your life will never yield easily to writing (you will ALWAYS have distractions more appealing or dictatorial than hours alone at the keyboard); you DO have time to write every day; and you don’t have to be working at A Very Important Work to be working at getting better – and becoming a faster and more polished writer will be very materially useful when you DO take on your great work.
And I know this from experience. The actual process of writing – of flowing, creating – is short, easy and pleasurable. But the rest of it is punishing. But it can be done, and done every day, and you don’t need inspiration, muses, a room of your own, loads of “free” time, or divine conviction.
You just need to do it. And the “it” I’m talking about is less about writing and more about editing.
Editing is exhausting, oft-dreaded, and fairly unsexy – but editing does have a redeeming quality: it can be done any time, any where. It simply must be done. Over and over and over.
I’m convinced that the secret to being a good writer is editing – and most of us don’t do enough of it.
Here’s how I usually write:
I sit down and pour it out. I don’t edit myself or criticize. I just let it come. This is a very pleasurable experience. This accounts for approximately ten percent of my writing time.
And then I edit. I polish. I look for ways to make my prose active and engaging. I substitute verbs. I delete adjectives and adverbs. (Who am I kidding? I add more.) I invert comparisons, I introduce and expand metaphors, I read aloud so as to stalk and kill extraneous words. I research the etymology of words. I riff and add poetic flourishes. I fix my punctuation. I curse my addiction to hyphens and parenthetical asides. I leave it. I come back to it. I make it worse. I make it better. I find its rhythm. I spell-check rhythm. I understate things, I overstate things, I use the word “and” instead of commas, I overuse commas. I introduce emotional tension. I lie. I say the exact opposite of what I mean, but I place that lie in a paragraph of truth so that it hisses and won’t lie still. I keep working at it. I edit. Endlessly.
This is work. This is labour. It is pleasurable in an abstract way – when I get past the dread and the difficulty and the unremitting and acute knowledge that my vision as a writer outstrips my abilities.
This accounts for ninety percent of my writing time. Because I believe that great writers write great sentences, almost all of my writing time is dedicated to wrestling my insecurities and futzing with the details.
And so my advice to other writers is unremarkable:
- Write every day – it can be an e-mail, a letter, some phrases, pretty words, a list…just write something.
- Edit more than you write.
- Futz with the details.
- Try not make your life an exercise in self-hatred because writing is already designed to work that muscle to exhaustion.
But my most cherished bit ‘o wisdom is this:
To improve your writing, you must strive to get your sentences either very right or very wrong.
And that’s what the next sixteen Sundays are all about. Sentences. Futzing. Details. Putting your precious prose under a microscope.
Each Sunday until the end of the year I’ll examine a stunning sentence and tell you what I love about it, what I learned from it, how I use what I learned in my own writing, and how you can too. And then together we’ll hold clinics in the comments.
———————–
Sunday School for Sentences #1: Explain the Expected in Unexpected Ways
Her posture revealed a minimalist approach to undergarments and a butterfly tattoo.
- by Siddhartha Herdegen, The Principles of Failure – a blog at the intersection of leadership, human behaviour, and economics. LOVELOVELOVE.
We all know what Siddhartha could have written. He could have written that her thong sat higher than her jeans and added snark about the dangers of low-rise jeans and vampy panties. That would have been predictable – and utterly forgettable.
What he did, however, was not forgettable.
I read this sentence months ago, and I regularly cite it to students and clients as an example of dazzling sentence. This sentence is a story in microcosm. This sentence is excellent.
What Siddhartha did right:
- He used understatement.
- He described something in an almost mechanical, factual way and let the reader fill in the emotive blanks.
- He used unexpected detail – “minimalist approach to undergarments” – to make a sentence sing.
What I took loved and learned from this sentence:
Try to say the usual in unusual ways. Use unexpected detail. Use understatement. Sometimes straight description, without emotional interpretation, can be completely compelling.
How I Used these Techniques In My Own Writing
Saying the Expected in Unexpected Ways (Unexpected Detail)
In this very piece, I laboured over a couple of sentences. In each of them I tried to follow Siddhartha’s example and say ordinary things in extraordinary ways.
And so I wrote:
- When attempting to create dazzling copy it is useful to avoid formulas that add up to writers block.
- A complete lack of faith in our skills and an insatiable desire to improve is the hell to which writers must acclimatize.
- Try not make your life an exercise in self-hatred because writing is already designed to work that muscle to exhaustion.
Understatement
In all three sentences, although perhaps not obvious to a more minimalist writer, I dialed down the emotional content.
(Overstatement is my natural go-to, so whenever I dial it down, even a little, I think I’m crafting my prose.)
In sentence #1, I tried to use understatement by saying “it is useful to avoid” rather than something overstated like “You MUST, at all costs, avoid…”.
In sentence #2 although I use overstatement (“hell”) I pair that charged subject with “acclimatize” – a neutral, bland verb. And so, with that verb choice, I’m at least waving at factual, objective reporting.
Factual Reporting
These sentences don’t really use factual reporting (except possibly in #2, see above) but the dispassionate tone of them tips their respective hats to factual reporting and is at odds with the passion inherent to all three subjects:
- writer’s block (ouch! avoid avoid avoid!);
- the pain of creation (no wonder many writers call their books their babies and compare the act of writing and editing to pregnancy and childbirth); and
- the loneliness and insecurity that accompanies creating something from nothing.
Mismatching tone and subject is one of my favourite techniques, because it is…unexpected.
Which, of course, is what I loved about Siddhartha’s sentence in the first place.
——————-
And you?
What did you like about this sentence?
How will you use understatement, unexpected detail and factual reporting to light up your own sentences? (Examples, please!)
————–
Sunday School for Sentences will be a sixteen-part series. Missed one? Here they are:
- Sunday School for Sentences #1: Explain the Expected in Unexpected Ways
- Sunday School for Sentences #2: The (Textual) Reverse Cowgirl
- Sunday School for Sentences #3: Object Lessons (from Kanye West and JD Salinger)
- Sunday School for Sentences #4: How to Give Good Quote
- Sunday School For Sentences #5: Why You Should Write Bad Poetry
- Sunday School for Sentences #6: Two Damn Fine Writing Tips
- Sunday School for Sentences #7: There Are No Magic Words
- Sunday School for Sentences #8: How To Execute a Climax or Series of Climaxes. I’m talking About Writing. Mostly.
- Sunday School for Sentences #9: Thread the Grommets, Lace the Corset, Feed the Rabbits
- Sunday School For Sentences #10 – Work It
- Sunday School for Sentences #11: The Pigs In Space Edition
- Sunday School for Sentences #12: Screw SEO. I Write (Wackadoo Titles) for PEOPLE, Not Search Engines. And So Should You.
- Sunday School for Sentences #13: How to Write an Intimate Cosmology of Cheesecake, Cheesecake Shots (or not) and Shoplifting
- Sunday School for Sentences #14: What Picasso And Dave Chappelle Know about Writing. For Realz.





Whooeee, Sunday School for Sentences! Now, that is a fine idea, and just what I need. Thank you for the breakdown on writer’s block too, although I would say that my block is usually over a certain blankness of the brain first, then my overactive inner editor.
About the sentence: my first reaction was to imagine the subject with a bad case of scoliosis. Being a female from an older generation, thongs are not the first undergarments that come to mind. I thought she was perhaps not wearing a bra, and the tattoo I visualized was on the back of her shoulder. When you explained it, I felt a little dumb for not picking up on the thong angle!
[Reply]
Kelly Diels
replied:
on September 5th, 2010 at 12:58 pm
@LaVonne Ellis, I’m so glad you like the idea and that you joined the fray…I liked your explanation for the visual that came to your mind. So interesting how differently we see the world and how we filter sentences through our own schema (as if there is anything else we could do!) – and that, in itself, is an important lesson to writers. When we strip our prose and allow readers to fill in the blanks, they’re contributing meaning, too. And no matter what we as writers meant or intended, in the end our prose is not beholden *only* to that vision.
[Reply]
Oh, so beautiful.
What did I love about that sentence? It was smooth and soft. I could feel it rolling through my mouth. It turned a garish view into a rather lovely scene. It made me love the subject before I judged her fashion decisions.
And your bit about spell-checking ‘rhythm’ made me giggle audibly.
[Reply]
Kelly Diels
replied:
on September 5th, 2010 at 12:59 pm
@Allissa Haines, Yes! Yes! Yes! I loved it for the same reasons.
glad for the giggles too…
[Reply]
“A complete lack of faith in our skills and an insatiable desire to improve is the hell to which writers must acclimatize.”
That’s a golden sentence. I knew you spent a lot of time creating it.
Love the word “acclimatize.” Love it. It is an apple of gold in settings of silvers.
I have found that editing takes up much more time than the actual process of pouring out words. And yes, it is much less pleasurable and not romantic.. it’s gotta be done though.
[Reply]
Chris
replied:
on September 5th, 2010 at 8:14 am
@Chris, Damn. I hate that you can’t edit comments!
What I meant to say was:
The word “acclimatize” in your sentence is like an apple of gold in settings of silver. (Proverbs 25:11)
[Reply]
Kelly Diels
replied:
on September 5th, 2010 at 1:00 pm
@Chris, love that we’re talking about editing and the importance of it…and then you follow up despairing at unleashing your prose before editing it to your satisfaction. Made me grin. Thanks.
[Reply]
Chris
replied:
on September 5th, 2010 at 1:32 pm
@Kelly Diels, The world is full of cruel ironies.
[Reply]
How did I react to Siddhartha’s sentence? It was love at first glance. He had me at…well everything. It sentence speaks volumes.
I will enjoy ‘Sunday School’ & that’s a sentence I thought I’d never write.
[Reply]
Kelly Diels
replied:
on September 5th, 2010 at 1:03 pm
@Shelley, now you just made me giggle. In one sentence, you just did exactly what you liked in Siddhartha’s work. You crafted a sentence that “speaks volumes”:
“I will enjoy ‘Sunday School’ & that’s a sentence I thought I’d never write.”
This is what we strive for: to load sentences with layers of meaning so that we’re alluding to stories and elaborating characters. When we do that we weave webby stories without needing to say: look here! here’s the plot! here’s what kind of person she is!
[Reply]
“I find its rhythm. I spell-check rhythm….”
I bloody love that about your writing. The way it makes me make involuntary noises.
And I have hyphen-love too.
(Don’t ask me to make a sparkly sentence today – I’m jet-lagged and moving-continents-lagged. Next Sunday, promise.)
[Reply]
Kelly Diels
replied:
on September 5th, 2010 at 1:04 pm
@Andrew Lightheart @alightheart, thank you honey. I await your gorgeous sentence, due next Sunday, and in the meantime will be content with your judicious use of “sparkly”. mwah.
[Reply]
I so need this Sunday School for Sentences! I love to write, but feel clueless about how to craft these kinds of luscious sentences that you & Siddhartha wrote. It’s almost like Sunday brunch after Sunday school, because these sentences are just so YUMMY.
[Reply]
Kelly Diels
replied:
on September 5th, 2010 at 1:05 pm
@Dawn Haney, darling, YOU are delicious. Thank you so much – can’t wait to see you here next week.
[Reply]
Great new series. I’m sure I’ll be checking back. My sentences deserve more love.
[Reply]
Kelly Diels
replied:
on September 5th, 2010 at 1:56 pm
@Ryan G, if they need more love, send me a few. I’m collecting sentences to review, adore and suggest improvements.
[Reply]
Hello, Ms. Kelly,
xxoo
I never thought I’d be so excited to see a school start. I’ve been wanting to work with you for ages, and now here’s a way to do so whilst I wait for my labors to bear fruits of green. (Hey, does that count as one of those sentences you were asking for…it’s actually pretty spiffy for me LOL). Looking forward to the rest of the Sunday’s. I think it may be time to sub by email so I can save the posts for future reference
Jenn
[Reply]
Kelly Diels
replied:
on September 5th, 2010 at 1:58 pm
@Gurl, yes darling, subscribe! And if you’re wanting to work with me, gratuis, e-mail me a couple of sentences/paragraphs that you’re proud of OR not so impressed with. As I told Ryan, I’m collecting sentences to workshop. I’d love it if you’d play too.
[Reply]
Brilliant idea, Kelly, lavishing a little Sunday devotion on our writing can only lead to spectacular things. I’d love to hear your thoughts on texture (one of the qualities I adore so much your writing is the crunchiness of it.) Thank you!
[Reply]
Kelly Diels
replied:
on September 5th, 2010 at 2:00 pm
@Natalie Peluso, “texture” is an interesting way to phrase it. I like it. What I try to do is introduce emotional tension and surprise so that my writing is both lyrical and gritty. That’s my goal. I don’t always succeed. But I have ideas about how to do that, and you’re right, it WILL be the subject of a future Sunday School lesson.
[Reply]
Oh! Sentences! I think I remember those. Back before I painted brush strokes of emotion to augment my photos. In that time before my soul would wrack itself each evening attempting to define, using only feeble and unforgiving words, the essence of raw Beauty and the hints of the Vast Mystery that magically become captured by my camera’s lens.
At those times fragments are my friend. A thousand, or even a million words all formed together in lyrical epic prose could not do more than forty or a hundred well placed fragments of sentences and thoughts and emotions.
But. For the times that a sentence is needed. For those times when creating the flow and appeal to capture a new audience and tempt a new client. I need your help. I need this learning. I will drink in these lessons and savour all of the new exotic flavours joined together in real sentences.
I will write in sentences.
And I thank you for this.
Hugs and butterflies,
~Teresa~
[Reply]
Great series Kelly! I always loved writing and was always good at it. Little problem (or my excuse) is that now I write not in my native language. I don’t have enough vocabulary and don’t “feel” English enough to be able to write as well. That’s why I read blogs like yours. I even have a special notebook where I write down all the sentences and phrases that caught my attention. This series is going to be so helpful. Thank you!
[Reply]
Lianne
replied:
on September 6th, 2010 at 5:09 pm
@Lana Kravtsova, Lana, I work with a woman from the Czech Republic and I am always writing down the things she says exactly because she is not a native English speaker so she has a beautiful, original way of saying things that a native speaker would not even think of. I bet you are the same – don’t miss this gift.
[Reply]
Dave Doolin
replied:
on September 7th, 2010 at 10:01 pm
@Lianne, I read and review papers from non-native speakers of various stripes. It’s not difficult, after a time, to deduce, from the rhythm and diction, the language group the writer calls native.
To wit, Chinese writing English “sound” very different than German or Russian writing English.
And so on.
[Reply]
Someone one asked Steinbeck for advice on writing and he simply replied “just write”. I always loved that line because it just was such a simple response and the first part of your post reminded me of that.
As for the sentence written from Siddhartha, what I love about it was that it conjured up images by only using words and not too many words. Kind of like a music lyric…poetic and yet visual…and kind of classy too.
[Reply]
Siddhartha’s sentence? Well, I wish I could say it knocked me down. It didn’t. But that’s me, ’cause what I’m looking for in writing is ATTITUDE. And I like it in my face. So when it comes to description, especially about babes, I’m waiting for a judgment about it, as in: “her thong sat higher than her jeans and added snark about the dangers of low-rise jeans and vampy panties.”
Nothing about that sentence is forgettable. Here’s what tingled me about it. “Snark” for starters. I’m crazy about the way that word sounds and I don’t even know what it means. Doesn’t matter. It’s snarky. But I did look it up, and it’s an imaginary animal used to refer to someone or something that is difficult to track down. What this has to do with “dangers of low-rise jeans” I have no idea, but dangerous low-rise jeans conjures all kinds of naughty thoughts in this dude’s head, and also warns me that “vampy panties” tempt cowboys with a blanket spread over the back seat of their truck. (No offense to cowboys. City dwellers bounce those back seats too.)
So yeah, minimal is cool. But I go for layered info stirred up like a salad. And that dear Kelly, is also your style.
Irv
[Reply]
Kelly Diels
replied:
on September 6th, 2010 at 10:27 am
@Irving Podolsky, I have “the grass is greener” disease. I ADORE minimalist writing. Hemingway. MMMMMMMMM. (Though he can’t write women, poor dear.) But my own writing, as you noticed, and I KNOW, is not stripped but studded with luxurious adjectives and adverbs.
There’s a line from a song I like (Fire In Your New Shoes) that somewhat describes my (unedited) style:
“…I’m going rococo with sequins in the summer…”
Because if a little is good, more is better.
And minimalist is HARD.
[Reply]
Kimberlee
replied:
on September 15th, 2010 at 10:59 am
I happened upon you by accident, if there is any such thing. Reading this has made me a tad giddy.
I hand craft and {attempt to} sell jewelry and other accessories, mostly for brides, these days. The style is glam and pretty and a little like “rococo with sequins” but more rural and approachable. I write listings for my items but would like to infuse an air of elegance or more specifically (and honestly), infallible reasons for my reader to purchase my items. I am slightly in love with the idea of using understatement. I’d love to know what you think. Do you think it’s “safe” to use it in writing to sell my products? Maybe I should stick with using more “luxurious adjectives and adverbs.” I’d like to use understatement, too, in my blog writing, but then I would actually have to write it and I’m one of those you mentioned above who is waiting for writing to be easy. heh.
Kimberlee @ http://www.gracefullygirly.com
[Reply]
Great reminder. The good stuff never comes easy.
I’ve been making excuses instead of working through practicing. Blog, write, edit.
Thanks again.
Todd
@tojosan
[Reply]
This is a very beautiful post. Now, that sentence . . . that sentence — it automatically made me think of the writing of Henry James or some such writer whose sentences you love, but must read two or three (or more) times over to fully “get” the image or the idea. Which is a good thing. In fact, the sentence brought to mind for me some lovely slip of a lady twirling about with a parasol, like a subject in an impressionist painting. I didn’t AT ALL get a girl with a thong. Wow. So this is the beauty of sentences — we each get to “see” something different.
[Reply]
Another one who completely missed the thong reference. “Posture” threw me off – I conjured up a woman in a slouchy stance with breasts slightly sagging in their freedom from being bra-bound.
Whoa – a lot of alliteration from anxious anchors placed in powerful positions. *Broadcast News ref & family joke.
[Reply]
Thank you for delivering this post when I needed it the most. I’ve been trying to write all day, but I’m just not getting there. I think I expect too much, and I’m guilty of all the examples you set above.
I think this is a great idea and I’m looking forward to the next sundays!
[Reply]
Dave Doolin
replied:
on September 7th, 2010 at 9:51 pm
@Marthe, “Thank you for delivering this post when I needed it the most.”
Now that’s just poetry.
[Reply]
This is the first time I’ve ever read your blog, and frankly all I can say is, bravo! This post was excellent, but from all I’ve read on this site, you’re a person who’s freer in the mind than most people on this planet. I’m glad to say I found this blog, and even more that I’ve hit the subscribe button. Good luck to you, hope to be reading many more enticing posts!
[Reply]
Hello Kelly!
Many new things have been happening with my blog – such as a twitter account! And guess what, I figured out how to use it, and this article was my first retweet!
Thank you for writing posts like this. After reading what you wrote about understatements, I looked at my own journals and realized some if it was waaaaaay too loopy. Sometimes less really is more, and thank you for bringing that to light for me.
[Reply]
[...] week, I declared that good writing is “microscopic” and this example demonstrates what I meant. By using more inventive verbs – like [...]
[...] Sunday School for Sentences #1: Explain the Expected in Unexpected Ways [...]
[...] So that’s my lecture for the day on objects. Any time you’ve written a sentence in which you describe someone’s appearance, think about how to flesh out the descriptions and layer meaning and turn objects into symbols or symbols into objects. That’s what I tried to do with “V8 hearts and hopeful cars” and what Siddhartha Herdegen did with his (character’s) “minimalist approach to undergarments”. [...]
[...] Sunday School for Sentences #1: Explain the Expected in Unexpected Ways [...]
[...] Sunday School for Sentences #1: Explain the Expected in Unexpected Ways [...]
[...] Sunday School for Sentences #1: Explain the Expected in Unexpected Ways [...]
[...] Use understatement and strive to say the expected in unexpected ways. [...]
[...] Sunday School for Sentences #1: Explain the Expected in Unexpected Ways [...]
[...] do that because I believe live, luminous writing is microspopic; and, proceeding from that belief, I endeavour to provide you with tiny, almost instantly [...]
[...] Sunday School for Sentences #1: Explain the Expected in Unexpected Ways [...]
[...] 2. Writing is a way of thinking and the inventiveness of your metaphors mirrors the agility of your argument. [...]
[...] And then, to serve my theme, I mercilessly expunge the lazy phrasing, dead metaphors and cliched descriptions. I find inventive, inverted, perverted ways to express sometimes standard ideas. I extend metaphors with surprising word choice. It’s an exacting, microscopic process. The result can be luminous. [...]
[...] Sunday School for Sentences #1: Explain the Expected in Unexpected Ways [...]
[...] Sunday School for Sentences #1: Explain the Expected in Unexpected Ways [...]
[...] Sunday School for Sentences #1: Explain the Expected in Unexpected Ways [...]